-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 394
adding doc_type validation #4467
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
| getExceptions: () => [...exceptionList], | ||
| // Export valid doc types for reference | ||
| getValidDocTypes: () => [...VALID_DOC_TYPES] | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am legally obliged to comment newline at end of file, otherwise Dale will hunt me down :P
…into doc-type-validation
…into doc-type-validation
|
@dhtclk Please fix issues and merge when CI is green. |
Summary
we introduced doc_types but we need to have specific ones to maintain consistency, otherwise we could random types.